About Us

Name: American Sweetheart
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Biography
Name:
Email: deltasteveb@gmail.com
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

There's no need to fear! Underbama is here!

 
He was the underdog at the beginning of the primaries. New kid on the block. A minority. Not even wet behind the ears. Yet Underbama lept ahead over the incredibly cheated and shafted Hilldawg to pull a win in the first heat. He beat out a decorated war hero and race veteran with his partner the Cinderella story from the North West, a small town straight shooter that made it to the Governor's Mansion in the final race. They flocked by the millions to greet His Grace, not with open arms in welcome, but with open hands and empty piggy banks ready to be laid at the feet of the wealthy (also more commonly referred to as "tax payers").
 
I post this, though many of you have likely viewed it already, because Rick Santilli is one of the few people in all of this madness TALKING COMPLETE SENSE! *Pause for gasps in shock*
 
By a show of hands, who here would be more than happy to pay their next door neighbor's mortgage?  *Crickets chirping* - Oh and my favorite line in the whole video is "How about we all stop paying our mortgage? It's a moral hazard." -
 
There is NOTHING that this so-called (to steal a line from the Helen Thomas "Rules of Engagement" playbook)stimulus can do to save this economy. There is nothing it can do to save the housing situation. I am a firm believer in personal responsibility, and while I understand that the lenders preyed on some of these people via the Community Reinvestment Act, we as Americans simply cannot afford this and should NOT be bound by law to have our tax dollars given to the banks and people that purchased these loans with reckless abandon.
 
Let's review some facts:
Back in the fall of 2008, Congress passed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. The price tag? A whopping $700 BILLION. Under President Bush's administration, the first portion of the funds were released with the objective to buy troubled assets from lenders. Yet, Turbo Tax whiz and former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York turned Secretary of Treasury Timothy Geithner cannot account for the $350 BILLION appropriated in the 4th quarter of 2008.
 
Another $757 Billion stimulus bill was signed into law on Tuesday of this week by President Obama. This "Generational Theft Act" is the cure for all of our financial woes! Well, maybe not all of our spending woes. I'm sure it is the cure for people such as Henrietta Needsahousewithbathroom and Peggy the Moocher, but for the regular taxpaying, mortgage paying, responsible Americans this is a kick in the face. (By the way, how much do you have to make these days to be considered "wealthy"? $120K? $80K?)
 
Now, Underbama is proposing yet another $275 BILLION in spending to rescue homes pending foreclosure.
 
Wait a second, hold the phone! Wasn't the ORIGINAL $700 billion in bailout funds supposed to help ease the mortgage crisis?
 
When will the insanity end, America?
 
The Obama Administration has been running the show for 31 days. In that 31 days we have learned that passing a bill in the middle of the night with the evil Republicans locked out of the room was crucial to saving us all from inevitable doom. We have also learned that an unsigned bill can save us and that "emergency" doesn't mean much in Obama language. Timothy Geithner was supposed to keep track of $350 billion dollars but couldn't handle it. Now he is going to have to keep track of another $350 billion, plus $757 billion and a possible additional $275 billion?
 
Is your brain bleeding yet?
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (55) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More "Botched" Abortions To Excite FOCA Supporters

One of the most controversial bills on deck to be signed by President Obama is the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA). This is a bill sponsored by Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) that would essentially wipe out restrictions pertaining to abortion. President Obama has promised organizations such as Planned Parenthood that his first orders of business upon taking office would be to sign this bill.
 
The FOCA is viewed by the left as an opportunity to give women the freedom to control their own bodies and reproduction. It is a way to give women their natural born "rights."
 
What FOCA essentially does is rob unborn babies of their RIGHT to the opportunity to live. It will deny parents the RIGHT to know what their daughters are doing with their bodies and the bodies of their grandchildren. It will eliminate the right of doctors to choose to say NO to performing abortions and hospitals ran by Christian organizations to right to say "no" to infanticide occuring on their property. But the left will not let you in on those facts.
 
Partial birth abortion is murder of the most horrifying capacity. FOCA would allow this procedure to continue to take place.
 
I read this story on another blog yesterday and it put a hole in my heart. I was completely overcome with emotion and tears before I was able to read halfway down the page. (You can read the blog by choose Pink Elephant Pundit on my blogroll. She is fantastic voice for the conservative movement and I encourage all of my readers to check her out!)
 

Eighteen and pregnant, Sycloria Williams went to an abortion clinic outside Miami and paid $1,200 for Dr. Pierre Jean-Jacque Renelique to terminate her 23-week pregnancy.

Three days later, she sat in a reclining chair, medicated to dilate her cervix and otherwise get her ready for the procedure.

Only Renelique didn’t arrive in time. According to Williams and the Florida Department of Health, she went into labor and delivered a live baby girl.

What Williams and the Health Department say happened next has shocked people on both sides of the abortion debate: One of the clinic’s owners, who has no medical license, cut the infant’s umbilical cord. Williams says the woman placed the baby in a plastic biohazard bag and threw it out.

Police recovered the decomposing remains in a cardboard box a week later after getting anonymous tips.

“I don’t care what your politics are, what your morals are, this should not be happening in our community,” said Tom Pennekamp, a Miami attorney representing Williams in her lawsuit against Renelique (ren-uh-LEEK’) and the clinic owners.

You can read more on this story and it's progress in the investigation here Buffalo News.
 
This is UNACCEPTABLE. It is criminal. While the left and President Obama will continue to tell you that FOCA will eliminate instances such as this, think about this: FOCA will elminate restrictions on abortion which means that MORE women will have access to the partial birth abortion procedure. That will increase the chances of infants surviving the abortions and thereby instigating more medical professionals to resort to these criminal acts for the sake of the mother's wishes.
 
Remember: President Obama believes that a baby NOT carried to term is a "previable life." Those are HIS words. Here is quote from my blog "Protecting Life from the Beginning":

"Whenever we define a previable fetus as a person that is protected by the equal protection clause of the Constitution, what we are really saying is, in fact, that they are persons entitled to the kinds of protections what would be provided  to a-- a child, a nine month-old--child that was delivered to term. That determination would then, essentially, if accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place." 
 
You can read the entire transcript of that quote here Page 85 for the quote.
 
That folks, is from 2001. That is YOUR president.
 
Once again, I beg of you this question: My son was not carried to 40 weeks. He was carried to exactly 39 weeks. Should I have allowed him to be placed in a bag and throw on the rooftop of the hospital to starve and freeze to death on the snowy day that he was born last January 28, 2008? Was my son not human? Did he not have rights as a living, breathing infant, heart beating, neurons firing signals to his muscles to move?
 
At 23 weeks, I could feel Jordan kicking inside me. A child at 23 weeks can survive. They have survived. How is that previable? This young woman's child was born and LIVED. How can we not respect that as life?
 
All persons involved in this case should be tried for murder by a jury of their peers. This is sick and it MUST STOP.
 
Until we as a nation can learn to respect ALL human life, how can we claim to be compassionate to all of our citizens? Why is it that President Obama is willing to take OUR tax dollars and give to illegal aliens in our country for healthcare, but he will not protect the lives of infants born to citizens and give THEM healthcare.
 
He campaigned on a platform of change. He campaigned that we ALL as citizens have an undeniable RIGHT to receive healthcare. Most people that are pro-choice believe that life starts when the baby breathes its first breathe outside of the womb. These babies born in so called "botched" abortions breathe that air. They enter the world and suck that oxygen into their lungs upon exiting the womb and immediately should be considered citizens of these United States. Yet they are denied the RIGHT to healthcare that President Obama wishes to grant to ALL people living on US Soil.
 
Why not these babies?
 
I urge you all to consider writing your congressmen and women to put and end to this madness. Let them know that this should NOT occur. Not here. Let them know that YOUR hard earned money should not be used for the systematic slaughtering of infants. Let them know that they will not get your vote next election cycle if our tax dollars are sent oversees to fund abortions as a part of a so called "stimulus bill" that is supposedly aimed at helping the US economy out of a recession.
 
This is unconstitution. This is unamerican.
 
But as Obama stated many times in his speech on Thursday night, "The American people voted for change."
 
Is THIS the change you voted for? If not, then SPEAK UP.
 
 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (32) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sexist Claims from the Left=Hypocritical at Best

 

 
This is more completely typical musings from far left feminists. Mr. O'Reilly more than proved his point when Ms. Martin could not present ONE time that she felt the media was unfair to Govenor Palin.
 
I am sure that ALL of us can find PLENTY of examples of sexism against Governor Palin. However, recent history has shown us that feminists hold no strong affection for women that can shoot a gun or carry a baby to term, deliver and raise it (even with a disability).
 
Like Mr. O'Reilly, I too Googled Ms. Martin to search for any evidence of her supporting WOMEN and not just LIBERAL women. I do agree here with O'Reilly that Ms. Martin was taking him completely out of context. She twisted his words around. I watched O'Reilly after the softball game press conference. Helen Thomas's question was completely abysmal. We all know that the Taliban is hiding in Pakistan and in the region near the border. We have known this for quite some time, as Americans have been attacked in that area. Ms. Thomas's blatant hatred for the US was apparent when she referred to the Taliban as "So called terrorists." She is a liberal of the worst kind and believes that liberals should control the media and tell us the news from their point of view.
 
Sorry for the tangent, now back to my point. O'Reilly poked fun of Ms. Thomas and has every right to do so. It is not sexist. It is not ageist. It is simply having a laugh at something that was so obviously ridiculous. And yes, Ms. Thomas does sound like the Wicked Witch. (I have seen The Wizard of Oz over 100 times. Ask anyone in my family. I know the Wicked Witch when I see or hear her.)
 
Ms. Martin and those like her are all about female empowerment, as long as she is empowering females on the left. To people like her, conservative women aren't really women at all. You aren't a REAL woman unless you have purposely expelled a fetus from your uterus.
 
Here is what I found when I searched the Women's Media Center website for "Sarah Palin":
Article by Rachel Meadow This article somewhat praise's Sarah Palin's speaking skills, but then shoots her down for quoting "pseudo-facist" Westbrook Pegler.

Article by Robin Morgan
 This article talks about how "Sarah Palin is to all women what Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is to African American women and men. With triumphs like these, who needs setbacks? "
 
Wow...pretty powerful statement there Ms. Morgan! A woman who worked hard her whole life and without a fancy Ivy League degree became one of the most powerful women and the country and a true inspiration to working mothers and a voice for parents of children with disabilities is a setback for women? A woman that took on the Good Ol' Boy network, gives money BACK to her constituants every year because they deserve a cut of the resources being pulled from the land they pay taxes on is a SETBACK for women? A woman who can protect herself in the face of danger, cooks her kids dinner, drives herself to work everyday, can balance a budget to get a surplus, is the commander in chief of her state's National Guard (and visited them overseas) is a SETBACK for women?
 
I fail to see where Governor Palin is a setback for women. Last time I checked, I had a uterus and therefore I can speak as a woman and say that Governor Palin is a TRUE woman. She is an inspiration and proof that rolling up your sleeves and logging in the man hours can help you reach the stars.
 
It gets worse as you move down the list of articles that bring up Sarah Palin if you plug her name into the search engine on the WMC website. (And if you were wondering, yes. They do attack Bristol Palin and her fiance.)
 
I didn't find anything of particular interest on the WMC website, so I took back to the Google search engine to Ms. Martin's personal website which neatly packages all of her journalist material.
 
In her interview with O'Reilly she claims that she is not drinking the lefist Kool-Aid, yet she writes for the Huffington Post at times.
 
After reading through many articles of Ms. Martin and her own "slobering love affair" with Barrack Obama (thank you Bernie Goldberg), I found it. The article that Bill O'Reilly DIDN'T find in his Google search.
 
Sarah Palin's Retrograde Gender Politics and here is just a snipet from the article:
"Palin may have been plucked from obscurity to appeal to women voters who are aching for a maverick in mom's clothing, but don't be fooled. Palin is not on this ticket to bring gender balance to the White House; her primary role is to reinforce the almighty power of traditional masculinity."
 
"Palin is standing by her new man, McCain, in the sugary-sweet manner of a '50s pop song. Sure, she's a little feisty, but only in the service of making her war hero look manly and her own heroics look momly. She was strategically chosen as the sidekick who can call Obama a sissy without fearing the repercussions, and sway disappointed women voters in the process."
 
 
Governor Palin drew larger crowds than John McCain on the road. She ignited a fire back into the Republican party. Ms. Martin discredits Governor Palin further in the article (I encourage you to read it all the way through.)
 
While Ms. Martin claims that Helen Thomas is a big girl and can handle criticism, why is the Women's Media Center website campaigning for Bill O'Reilly to apologize to Thomas? Shouldn't Ms. Thomas just wear her big girl panties and suck it up?
 
More hypocricy and it grew old long ago. To quote Aerosmith, "It's the same old story, same old song and dance." Ms. Martin dodged the fact that she could not defend Sarah Palin or the sexism that Palin was met with during the campaign, but making fun of Ms. Thomas's tone of voice (NOT her appearance) and her softball question was inexcuseable.
 
I think that Ms. Martin needs to find her big girl panties.
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (15) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hmmm...Schumer Thinks We Don't Care??

NY Sen. Chuck Schumer on pork:

“And let me say this to all of the chattering class that so much focuses on those little, tiny, yes, porky amendments: the American people really don't care.”
 
 
Would you like to see the pork? (Courtesy of Senator Tom Coburn)
$2 billion earmark for FutureGen near zero emissions powerplant in Mattoon, IL
$39 billion slush fund for “state fiscal stabilization” bailout
$5.5 billion for making federal buildings “green” (including $448 million for DHS HQ)
$200 million for workplace safety in USDA facilities
$275 million for flood prevention
$65 million for watershed rehabilitation
$200 million for public computer centers at community colleges and libraries
$650 million for the DTV transition coupon program
$307 million for constructing NIST office buildings
$1 billion for administrative costs and construction of NOAA office buildings
$100 million for constructing U.S. Marshalls office buildings
$300 million for constructing FBI office buildings
$800 million for constructing Federal Prison System buildings and facilities
$10 million to fight Mexican gunrunners
$1.3 billion for NASA (including $450 million for “science” at NASA)
$100 million to clean up sites used in early U.S. atomic energy program
$10 million for urban canals
$2 billion for manufacturing advanced batteries for hybrid cars
$1.5 billion for carbon capture projects under sec. 703 of P.L. 110-140 (though section only authorizes $1 billion for five years)
$300 million for hybrid and electric cars for federal employees
$198 million to design and furnish the DHS headquarters
$255 million for “priority procurements” at Coast Guard (polar ice breaker)
$500 million for State and local fire stations
$180 million for construction of Bureau of Land Management facilities
$500 million for wildland fire management
$110 million for construction for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
$522 million for construction for the Bureau of Indian Affairs
$650 million for abandoned mine sites
$75 million for the Smithsonian Institution
$1.2 billion for summer jobs for youth
$412 million for CDC headquarters
$500 million earmark for NIH facilities in Bethesda, MD
$160 million for “volunteers” at the Corp. for National and Community Service
$750 earmark for the National Computer Center in MD
$224 million for International Boundary and Water Commission – U.S. and Mexico
$850 million for Amtrak
$100 million for lead paint hazard reduction
 
Maybe the American people that DO care should let Senator Schumer know...
 
Contact Info Courtesy of Michelle Malkin's Blog
Schumer, Charles E. - (D - NY) Class III
313 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-6542
Web Form:
schumer.senate.gov/new_website/contact.cfm
Fax:202-228-3027

District Office- Albany:
Leo O’Brien Building, Room 420
Albany, NY 12207
Phone: 518-431-4070
Fax: 518-431-4076

District Office- Binghamton:
15 Henry Street, Room B6
Binghamton, NY 13901
Phone: 607-772-6792
Fax: 607-772-8124

District Office- Buffalo:
111 West Huron Street, Room 620
Buffalo, NY 14202
Phone: 716-846-4111
Fax: 716-846-4113

District Office- Hudson Valley:
Post Office Box A
Red Hook, NY 12571
Phone: 914-285-9741
Fax: 845-758-1043

District Office- Long Island:
145 Pine Lawn Road, Room 300
Melville, NY 11747
Phone: 631-753-0978
Fax: 631-753-0997

District Office- New York City:
757 Third Avenue, Suite 17-02
New York, NY 10017
Phone: 212-486-4430
TTYD Number: 212-486-7803
Fax: 212-486-7693

District Office- Rochester:
100 State Street, Room 3040
Rochester, NY 14614
Phone: 585-263-5866
Fax: 585-263-3173

District Office- Syracuse:
100 South Clinton Street, Room 841
Syracuse, NY 13261-7318
Phone: 315-423-5471
Fax: 315-423-5185
 
 

Senator Schumer,

I am writing to you to let you know that Americans such as myself DO in fact care about pork projects injected into this large SPENDING bill. This is MY future. This is my son's future and before the spending package passed my son that just turned 1 last month was $184,000 in debt. You have already passed a "bailout" that no one can seem to say what happened to the first part of the money and now you are about to spend the second part with NO PLAN once again. This is not the Republican's fault. This is no Bush's fault. This is every US Senator and Congressman that is more worried about spending money to make government bigger's fault. This is Senator Dodd, Congressman Frank, Senator Reid, and Speaker Pelosi's fault and they cannot seem to accept the blame for any of this when they were the ones claiming that everything was peachy keen.

DO NOT let this pork pass. This is completely ridiculous. It is unconstitutional. It is not what the American people want. If you all would LEAVE Washington for a few days and TALK to the REAL American people and live like us for awhile, maybe then you would know what the American people want. You don't seem to have a CLUE.

Respectfully yours,

Proud American, Extremely Concerned Voter
 
Good luck getting thru to his phone lines, but KEEP TRYING!!!!!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Welcome to having 8 Additional Children to Raise!

 
I am appalled by this woman. Children are a miracle and I honestly feel heartache for couples that need to resort to fertility treatments to have children. I cannot imagine the expense, levels of disappointment when treatments don't work, and just the general stress that women and men that are infertile go through when all they want to do is bring a healthy, happy child into this world. But this is an entirely different case.
 
This woman, Nadya Doud, is 33 and has 14 children. The first 6 (also each conceived via in vitro fertilization), are ranging between the ages of 2 and 7. The two year olds are twins.
 
Neighbors speculate that this woman is a good mother. While I do not doubt her love for these children, there is more to being a good mother than love. Anyone can love a child. But it takes a strong, responsible adult to CARE for a child. That is a completely separate part of being a parent. Being able to provide the medical and financial care for one child can be a struggle, even on what most would consider a good salary. Caring for 14, half of which are pre-maturely born newborns though is an astronomical cost that even the most well-to-do couple would struggle with on top of their normal bills and expenses.
 
Some people are saying that we should leave Ms. Doud be because this is none of the public's business. The problem with that statement is that her inability to provide for all of these children automatically MAKES this the business of the public.
 
Let's look at this realistically.
 
A case of diapers costs roughly $27.99. That is for around 116 diapers for a size 3 (probably closer to 140 for size newborn if I remember correctly from a year ago). Add in that if you want to be cost efficient on wipes, you will purchase refill packs of 3 rather than single dispenser boxes that run around $3-4 each. (3 refill packs are about $4.00 if you get the Target or Wal Mart brands). Now add in a can of formula, averaging around $24 for the large powder mix or $14 for the standard 12-14 oz. (I cannot imagine that she could POSSIBLY produce enough milk to feed 8 children, as most women that feed twins will spend approximately 12 hours a day just feeding). Now add in clothing. One pack of onesies (about 3 or 4 to a pack) runs around $8-10. Sleepers you can get for about $6 at Target. Bottles, you can get a 3 pack of the generic Target brand for $6, but that does not mean that the baby will take that bottle. I had to try 2 or 3 types of different nipple flows just to get Jordan to take a bottle that he was comfortable with. Pediatrician visits, you may have an average $15 co-pay for one child. So 8 infants that will be seen at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 1 year...$960 in copays for the regular check ups. Now what if those children become ill? Separate doctor visits, more co-pays, plus antibiotics, also factor in that out of 8 children, probably at least 1 of them is likely to need to visit a specialist for something like being suceptible to ear infections, maybe bad allergies, bad case of eczema, poor eyesight, etc.
 
Do we see the point here? That is all for 8 infants. Ms. Doud has 6 other children all under the age of 8 that are not exempt from falling off a bicycle and breaking an arm or getting chicken pox from a class mate and spreading it to the other siblings (imagine 14 children at home with chicken pox).
 
Ms. Pilchman in the video is wrong. Plain and simple. This is an extreme case of selfishness. Like O'Reilly I want to know what would have possessed a doctor to implant 8 embryos into a woman that already has 6 children and has obviously not had an issue with the in vitro method of conception.
 
Ms. Doud may love being a parent, but these children are living in a 3 bedroom home. She is relying on the kindness of others to help with her children, however it is not her friend's responsibility to care for these children. People can be kind and helpful and I believe in helping your neighbor, but your neighbor cannot raise your children.
 
What about the other 6 children? What kind of attention will she be able to give them with 8 newborns to care for? No husband to help. I know personally how hard it can be to take care of 1 infant without the help of a husband. It is not easy. I am currently listening to my 1 year old crying in his crib while I write this because we are on day 2 of tough love, he has to learn to put himself to sleep at bedtime in his crib instead of sleep with mommy. I could never do 8 babies plus putting 6 other kids to bed. I don't know many that could.
 
At this time, Ms. Doud's employment is in question. She has a degree in child and adolescent development from California State University and is reported to have a psychiatric technicians license.
 
This is the public's business because WE are going to be paying for these children. The kindness and generosity of others will not be enough for one to successfully raise 14 children. It will not be enough to cloth them, take them to appointments, help them with their homework, feed them.
 
This is an outrage. The American people should be livid. I question this woman's state of mind. I question anyone that would be possessed to do something like this.
 
And we can all thank Ms. Doud when we receive the bill for their healthcare and food.
 
Tags: octuplets  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (20) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »